Generating precoders for joint transmission from multiple transmission points to multiple user equipments in a downlink coordinated multipoint transmission/reception communications system

ABSTRACT

There is provided generating precoders for joint transmission (JT) in a downlink coordinated multi-point transmission/reception (DL COMP) wireless communications system. The system includes a plurality of transmission points (TPs) operable to communicate with a plurality of user equipments (UEs). Each UE has one of the TPs as its serving TP. The method includes transmitting channel state information (CSI) from each UE to its serving TP, wherein the transmitted CSI includes precoder matrix indicators (PMI), and using the PMI to generate precoders for transmission of data from the plurality of TPs to the plurality of UEs.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to generating precoders for joint transmission (JT) from multiple transmission points to multiple user equipments in a Downlink Coordinated Multi-Point transmission/reception (DL CoMP) communications system.

BACKGROUND ART

The following abbreviations are used herein:

CoMP Coordinated Multi-Point (the abbreviation CoMP often also means Coordinated Multi-Point transmission/reception, as will be evident from the context) CQI Channel Quality Indicator CSI Channel State Information - CSI includes PMI, RI, CQI (see below) DL Downlink DMRS Demodulation Reference Signal eNodeB Evolved NodeB (i.e. evolved base station) JT Joint Transmission MMSE Minimum Mean Squared Error PMI Precoder Matrix Indicator SINR Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio RI Rank Indicator TP Transmission Point UE User Equipment

Also, the following mathematical notations are adopted herein:

-   -   |a| denotes the absolute value of a;     -   ∥a∥²=|a(1)|²+ . . . +|a(N)|² (unless stated otherwise);     -   Ea denotes the expectation (or expected value) of a; and     -   For any matrix A, A^(H) denotes the conjugate transpose of A,         and tr(A) represents the operation of taking the trace of A.

Joint Transmission Downlink Coordinated Multi-Point transmission/reception (JT-DL CoMP).

FIG. 1 schematically represents JT in a DL CoMP system. The system includes multiple TPs (these may be eNodeBs), each TP being equipped with multiple antennas, and multiple UEs where each UE is also equipped with multiple antennas. The multiple TPs transmit data to the multiple UEs on the same time-frequency. Generally, to minimise interferences between TPs and between UEs, the transmission is carried out with CoMP precoders which are generated based on (i.e. generated from the knowledge of) the channel state information (CSI).

Each UE feeds back CSI (which includes RI, PMI and CQI) to its serving TP via uplink, as illustrated in FIG. 2.

In CSI measurement, for each UE there are as many CSI configurations as there are TPs involved in JT-DL CoMP. FIGS. 3A and 3B show CSI measurement for a UE involved in JT-DL CoMP with two TPs. The CSI config#0 is for TP#0 (the serving TP) and the CSI config#1 is for TP#1 (the neighbouring TP).

System Description

A JT DL CoMP system having N_(TP) TPs and N_(UE) UEs may be described mathematically as set out below.

Let τ_(n) denote the number of antennas at the n-th TP. The total number of transmit antennas N_(TX) used in DL CoMP transmission is:

$N_{TX} = {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N_{TP}}{\tau_{n}.}}$

Let N_(RX) denote the number of receive antennas at each UE, and let H_(in) (size N_(RX)×τ_(n)) denote the channel between the n-th TP and the i-th UE.

Then the DL CoMP channel of the i-th UE (size N_(RX)×N_(TX)) is:

H_(i)=└H_(i1) , H _(i2), . . . , H_(iN) _(TP) ┘, i=1, . . . , N_(UE)  Equation (1)

Let V_(i) (size N_(TX)×RI_(i)) denote the precoder for the i-th UE.

The received signal at the i-th UE (y_(i)) is given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{y_{i} = {{H_{i}{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}{V_{j}x_{j}}}} + n_{i}}},{i = 1},\ldots \mspace{14mu},N_{UE}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (2)} \end{matrix}$

where n_(i) is additive Gaussian noise. Note that, from the DMRS, the i-th UE can find the effective channel H_(i)V_(i) to generate a decoder.

Precoding

Precoding is dependent on PMI which is part of the CSI. (Recall that CSI is fed back by a UE to its serving TP via uplink.) Let p_(in) denote the PMI corresponding to H_(in). Note that in a 2-stage PMI codebook system, p_(in) is a pair PMI#1 and PMI#2.

According to the 3GPP standard (TS 36.211), the precoder W_(in) (of size τ_(n)×RI_(i)) associated with the reported PMI p_(in) is used for precoding data to send from the n-th TP to the i-th UE. The total DL CoMP precoder is therefore given by:

$\begin{matrix} {{V_{i} = \begin{bmatrix} W_{i\; 1} \\ W_{i\; 2} \\ \vdots \\ W_{{iN}_{TP}} \end{bmatrix}},{i = 1},\ldots \mspace{14mu},N_{UE}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (3)} \end{matrix}$

Note that, in a 2-stage PMI codebook system, W_(in)=W_(in(1))×W_(in(2)) associated with PMI#1 and PMI#2.

Precoding in this way is not optimal and it may be desirable to provide an improved or at least an alternative way of generating precoders.

It is to be clearly understood that mere reference herein to previous or existing systems, methods, models, processes, procedures, practices, publications or other information, or to any problems or issues, does not constitute an acknowledgement or admission that any of those things individually or in any combination formed part of the common general knowledge of those skilled in the field, or that they are admissible prior art.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In one broad form, the invention provides a method for generating precoders for joint transmission (JT) in a downlink coordinated multi-point (DL CoMP) wireless communications system, the system including a plurality of transmission points (TPs) operable to communicate with a plurality of user equipments (UEs) wherein each UE has one of the TPs as its serving TP, and the method comprises:

transmitting channel state information (CSI) from each UE to its serving TP, wherein the transmitted CSI includes precoder matrix indicators (PMI), and

using the PMI to generate precoders for transmission of data from the plurality of TPs to the plurality of UEs.

The use of the PMI to generate precoders may involve using the PMI to find a representative matrix (Ĥ_(in)) representing the channel (H_(in)) between an n-th TP and an i-th UE. In some embodiments, a fixed codebook (Ω_(RI)) of representative matrices may be generated from PMI codebook(s), the CSI transmitted from each UE to its serving TP may include a rank indicator (RI), and Ω_(RI) may be different for different RI. In such embodiments, if the RI for the i-th UE (RI_(i)) is equal to the number of receive antennas of the UE (N_(RX)) (i.e. if RI_(i)=N_(RX)) then Ω_(RI) may contain matrices Ĥ(m), m=1, . . . of size N_(RX)×τ_(n), where τ_(n) is the number of antennas at the n-th TP. Alternatively, if RI_(i) is less than N_(RX) (i.e. if RI_(i)<N_(RX)) then Ω_(RI) may contain vectors ĥ(m), m=1, . . . of size τ_(n)×1. Proposals for the way in which Ĥ_(in) may be calculated in specific embodiments of the invention, both for the case where RI_(i)=N_(RX), and also the case where RI_(i)<R_(RX), are discussed below.

It is envisaged that non-coherent precoding may be used in some embodiments (or some embodiments may operate or be used in systems where non-coherent precoding is used), and where this is so the method for generating precoders may further comprise using the representative matrix Ĥ_(in), a Lagrange multiplier ν_(n) and a noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² to compute the precoders (V_(in)). The precoders V_(in) may be computed using an iterative procedure. Proposals for the way in which the precoders V_(in) and the Lagrange multiplier ν_(n) may be calculated for the case of non-coherent precoding in specific embodiments of the invention are discussed below.

Whilst non-coherent precoding may be used in some embodiments of the invention, in other embodiments coherent precoding may be used (or embodiments may operate or be used in systems where coherent precoding is used). Where coherent precoding is used, the method for generating precoders may involve finding the representative matrix (Ĥ_(in)) in the manner described for the case of non-coherent precoding (as discussed above and also in further detail below), and then further finding a representative matrix Ĥ_(i) representing the total channel as follows:

Ĥ_(i)=└Ĥ_(i1), Ĥ_(i2), . . . , Ĥ_(iN) _(TP) ┘, i=1, . . . , N_(UE)

In the case of coherent precoding, the method for generating precoders may further comprise using the said representative matrix Ĥ_(i), a Lagrange multiplier ν and a noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² to compute the precoders (V_(i)). Like in the case of non-coherent precoding, for the case of coherent precoding the precoders V_(i) may be computed using an iterative procedure. Proposals for the way in which the precoders V_(i) and the Lagrange multiplier ν may be calculated for the case of coherent precoding in specific embodiments of the invention are discussed below.

Regardless of whether coherent precoding or non-coherent precoding is used, the CSI transmitted from each UE to its serving TP may include (in addition to the PMI) a channel quality indicator (CQI), and the above-mentioned noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² may be found using the CQI by i) finding the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR_(i1)) based on thresholds in the CQI table; and ii) calculating σ_(i) ² using the SINR_(i1) and the serving TP's transmit power P_(s). A specific proposal for the way in which this might be done is discussed below.

As mentioned above, the CSI transmitted from each UE to its serving TP may include a rank indicator (RI). Suitably, from the up to N_(TP) reported RI_(in), the majority may be selected as a single common RI_(i) for the i-th UE. In this case, it may be that only CQI_(i{circumflex over (n)})(l) associated with the selected RI_(i) are candidates for CQI selection. The selection may be carried out per codeword independently, and the majority among the candidates may be selected as a common CQI for l-th codeword CQI_(i)(l).

In another broad form, the invention provides a downlink coordinated multi-point (DL CoMP) wireless communications system in which joint transmission (JT) is performed between a plurality of transmission points (TPs) and a plurality of user equipments (UEs), wherein each UE has one of the TPs as its serving TP, channel state information (CSI) is transmitted from each UE to its serving TP, the transmitted CSI includes precoder matrix indicators (PMI), and the PMI is used to generate precoders for transmission of data from the plurality of TPs to the plurality of UEs.

Aspects and features described herein with reference to one form of the invention (e.g. the method form) may also form part of, or be used (in any combination) in any other form of the invention (e.g. the system form). In fact, more generally, any of features or aspects described herein can be combined in any combination with any one or more other features or aspects described herein within the scope of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Preferred features, embodiments and variations of the invention may be discerned from the following Detailed Description which provides sufficient information for those skilled in the art to perform the invention. The Detailed Description is not to be regarded as limiting the scope of the preceding Summary of the Invention in any way. The Detailed Description will make reference to a number of drawings as follows:

FIG. 1 is schematically represents a JT-DL CoMP system.

FIG. 2 is schematically represents the way each UE feeds back CSI to its serving TP via uplink.

FIG. 3A schematically illustrates CSI measurement for JT-DL CoMP.

FIG. 3B schematically illustrates CSI measurement for JT-DL CoMP.

FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating, for the case of non-coherent precoding, a method for generating j-MMSE precoders in accordance with the embodiment of the invention discussed below.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating, for the case of non-coherent precoding, a method for computing the Lagrange multiplier for the n-th TP.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating, for the case of coherent precoding, a method for generating j-MMSE precoders in accordance with the embodiment of the invention discussed below.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating, for the case of coherent precoding, a method for computing the Lagrange multiplier for all TPs.

FIG. 8 schematically illustrates the estimation of a UE's noise variance based on the reported CQI of the serving TP.

FIG. 9 schematically illustrates RI and CQI collection from the reported RI and CQI for transmission to the i-th UE.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Joint transmit & receive optimisation methods have previously been proposed. See, for example, Sampath H. and Paulraj A., “Joint Transmit and Receive Optimization for High Data Rate Wireless Communication Using Multiple Antennas”, Thirty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 1999, and Zhang J., et. al., “Joint Linear Transmitter and Receiver Design for Downlink of Multiuser MIMO Systems”, IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 9, No. 11, November 2005.

Embodiments of the present invention provide MMSE precoders based (at least somewhat) on the joint transmit & receive optimization methods discussed in the above academic papers. However, unlike the methods in these academic papers, the present invention does not require knowledge of the channel to generate MMSE precoders. Instead (and in contrast), embodiments of the invention require only the PMI, which is fed back by UEs to serving TPs, as shown in FIG. 2. The precoder according to the particular embodiments of the invention discussed below will be referred to as the j-MMSE precoder.

A) Non-Coherent Precoding

In the case of non-coherent precoding, the individual j-MMSE precoder V_(in) is computed using the joint transmit and receive MMSE optimization as follows.

Finding Representative Channels

Let Ω_(RI) denote the fixed codebook of representative channel matrices which is generated from the PMI codebook(s). There are different Ω_(RI) for different RI.

-   -   For RI_(i)=N_(RX), the Ω_(RI) contains matrices Ĥ(m), m=1, . . .         of size N_(RX)×τ_(n)     -   For RI_(i)<N_(RX), the Ω_(RI) contains vectors ĥ(m), m=1, . . .         of size τ_(n)×1

Let Ĥ_(in) be the representative for the channel H_(in). The representative channel is obtained as follows:

If RI_(i)=N_(RX), then

Ĥ _(in) =Ĥ(m*)εΩ_(RI), i=1, . . . , N_(UE), n=1, . . . , N_(TP)

with

$\begin{matrix} {{m^{*} = {\underset{m}{\arg \; \max}{tr}\left\{ {\left\lbrack {{\hat{H}(m)}W_{in}} \right\rbrack^{H}\left\lbrack {{\hat{H}(m)}W_{in}} \right\rbrack} \right\}}},{{\hat{H}(m)} \in \Omega_{RI}}} & {{Eqaution}\mspace{14mu} (4)} \end{matrix}$

If RI_(i)<N_(RX), then

1) Calculate correlation values:

C _(in)(m)=tr{[ĥ ^(H)(m)W _(in)]^(H)[ĥ^(H)(m)W _(in)]}, m=1, . . .  Equation (5)

and

2) Sort to find the N_(RX) correlation values C_(in)(m₁)>C_(in)(m₂) > . . . >C_(in)(m_(N) _(RX) ) and the N_(RX) corresponding ĥ(m₁), ĥ(m₂), . . . , ĥ(m_(N) _(RX) ) to form the channel matrix

Ĥ _(in) =[ĥ(m ₁),ĥ(m ₂), . . . ,ĥ(m _(N) _(RX) )]^(H)  Equation (6)

Here W_(in) (of size τ_(n)×RI_(i)) is the precoder in the 3GPP standard (TS 36.211) associated with the PMI p_(in). Note that, if the PMI consists of PMI#1 and PMI#2, then W_(in)=W_(in(1))×W_(in(2)).

Generating the j-MMSE Precoder V_(in) (see FIG. 4)

Let (m) denote the m-th iteration of the procedure. The precoder is generated as follows:

-   -   1) (401) Initialize G_(in) (m=0)=J_(in), i=1, . . . , N_(UE).         Here J_(in) is a RI_(i)×τ_(n) matrix with the (a,b)-th element         being zero for a≠b and being 1 for a=b.     -   2) (402) Compute V_(in)(m+1) using G_(in)(m) and the Lagrange         multiplier ν_(n) for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows.

$\begin{matrix} {{V_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{jn}^{H}{G_{jn}^{H}(m)}{G_{jn}(m)}{\hat{H}}_{jn}}} + {\upsilon_{n}I}} \right\rbrack^{- 1}{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}{G_{i\; n}^{H}(m)}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (7)} \end{matrix}$

-   -   3) (403) Compute G_(in)(m+1) using V_(in)(m+1) and the given         noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as         follows.

$\begin{matrix} {{G_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {{V_{i\; n}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}{V_{jn}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{V_{jn}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}}} + {\sigma_{i}^{2}I}} \right\rbrack}^{- 1}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (8)} \end{matrix}$

-   -   4) (404) Compute

$E = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\; n}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}}$

-   -   5) (405) increment m and repeat step 2), step 3) and step 4)         until

${\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\; n}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}} < {ɛ.}$

Here ∥·∥² _(F) denotes Frobenius norm and ε is the convergent threshold.

-   -   6) (406) Output V_(in)(m+1), i=1, . . . N_(UE).

Computing the Lagrange multiplier ν_(n) (see FIG. 5)

For each of the n-th TP, the Lagrange multiplier ν_(n) is computed as follows.

-   -   1) (501) Compute λ_(k) as

$\begin{matrix} {{U\; \Lambda \; U^{H}} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}{G_{i\; n}^{H}(m)}{G_{i\; n}(m)}{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (9)} \end{matrix}$

-   -   2) (502) Set ν_(min) and ν_(max)     -   3) (503) Set ν_(n)=(ν_(max)+ν_(min))/2 .     -   4) (504) Compute the following quantity

${\hat{P}}_{n} = {\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\tau_{n}}\; {\frac{\lambda_{k}}{\left( {\lambda_{k} + \upsilon_{n}} \right)^{2}}.}}$

-   -   5) (505) Check if {circumflex over (P)}_(n)>P_(n) and if so set         ν_(min)=ν_(n) otherwise set ν_(max)=ν_(n). Here P_(n) is the         transmit power of the n-th TP.     -   6) (506) Repeat step 3), step 4) and step 5) until |{circumflex         over (P)}_(n)−P_(n)|<ε. Here ε is the convergent threshold.     -   7) (507) Output ν_(n).

B) Coherent Precoding

In the case of coherent precoding, the total j-MMSE precoder V, is computed using the joint transmit and receive MMSE optimization as follows:

Finding Representative Channels

First the individual representative channel Ĥ_(in) is found as in the non-coherent case discussed above. Then the total channel is generated by:

Ĥ_(i)=└Ĥ_(i1) , Ĥ _(i2), . . . , Ĥ_(iN) _(TP) ┘, i=1, . . . , N_(UE)  Equation (10)

Generating the j-MMSE Precoder V_(i) (see FIG. 6)

Let (m) denote the m-th iteration of the procedure. The precoder is generated as follows:

-   -   a) (601) Initialize G_(i)(m=0)=J_(i), i=1, . . . , N_(UE) . Here         J_(i) is a RI_(i)×N_(TX) matrix with the (a,b)-th element being         zero for a≠b and being 1 for a=b.     -   b) (602) Compute V_(i)(m+1) using G_(i)(m) and the Lagrange         multiplier ν for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows.

$\begin{matrix} {{V_{i}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{j}^{H}{G_{j}^{H}(m)}{G_{j}(m)}{\hat{H}}_{j}}} + {\upsilon \; I}} \right\rbrack^{- 1}{\hat{H}}_{i}^{H}{G_{i}^{H}(m)}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (11)} \end{matrix}$

-   -   c) (603) Compute G_(i)(m+1) using V_(i)(m+1) and the given noise         variance estimate σ_(i) ² for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows.

$\begin{matrix} {{G_{i}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {{V_{i}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{{\hat{H}}_{i}^{H}\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i}{V_{j}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{V_{j}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{\hat{H}}_{i}^{H}}} + {\sigma_{i}^{2}I}} \right\rbrack}^{- 1}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (12)} \end{matrix}$

-   -   d) (604) Compute

$E = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\;}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\;}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}}$

-   -   e) (605) increment m and repeat step b), step c) and step d)         until

${\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\;}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\;}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}} < {ɛ.}$

-   -   f) (606) Output V_(i)(m+1), i−1, . . . N_(UE)

Computing the Lagrange Multiplier ν (see FIG. 7)

The Lagrange multiplier ν is obtained as follows.

-   -   1) (701) Compute λ_(k) as

$\begin{matrix} {{U\; \Lambda \; U^{H}} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i\;}^{H}{G_{i\;}^{H}(m)}{G_{i\;}(m)}{\hat{H}}_{i\;}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (13)} \end{matrix}$

-   -   2) (702) Set ν_(min) and ν_(max)     -   3) (703) Set ν=(ν_(max)+ν_(min))/2.     -   4) (704) Compute the following quantity

$\hat{P} = {\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N_{TX}}\; {\frac{\lambda_{k}}{\left( {\lambda_{k} + \upsilon} \right)^{2}}.}}$

-   -   5) (705) Check if {circumflex over (P)}>P and if so set         ν_(min)=ν otherwise set ν_(max)=ν. Here P is the total transmit         power,

$P = {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N_{TP}}\; {P_{n}.}}$

-   -   6) (706) Repeat step 3), step 4) and step 5) until |{circumflex         over (P)}−P|<ε. Here ε is the convergent threshold.     -   7) (707) Output the Lagrange multiplier ν.

C) Noise Variance Estimating (see FIG. 8)

The following noise variance estimation may be used for both non-coherent and coherent precoding. The method estimates the UE's noise variance from the reported CQI for the serving TP is as follows:

-   -   1) (801) Find SINR_(i1) based on the SINR thresholds in the CQI         table.     -   2) (802) Calculate σ_(i) ² using SINR_(i1) and the serving TP's         transmit power P_(s) as follows.

$\begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{i}^{2} = \frac{P_{s}/N_{UE}}{\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{L_{i}}\; {{SINR}_{il}/L_{i}}}},\mspace{11mu} {i = 1},\ldots \mspace{14mu},N_{UE}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} (14)} \end{matrix}$

where L_(i) the number of codewords used for the i-th UE. For less complexity, the noise variance can be fixed to zero as:

σ_(i) ²=0, i=1 , . . . , N_(UE)  Equation (15)

D) Rank and CQI selection (see FIG. 9)

Because, for a given UE, all TPs have common transmission rank and common CQI, it follows that rank and CQI selection is necessary. From the as many as N_(TP) reported RI_(in), the majority is selected as the single common RI_(i) for the i-th UE. The selection can be done using the histogram. Then only CQI_(i{circumflex over (n)}) (l) associated with the selected RI_(i) are the candidates for CQI selection. The selection is carried out per codeword independently. The majority among the candidates is selected as the common CQI for the l-th codeword CQI_(i)(l). The selection can be done using the histogram.

Advantages

As discussed above, embodiments of the present invention do not require knowledge of the channel to generate the j-MMSE precoder. Rather, they require only the PMI which is fed back by UEs. This may provide a number of advantages. For instance, it may provide improved performance in comparison with methods which directly use reported PMI. Also, as is made evident above, the invention is applicable to both coherent and non-coherent precoding.

In the present specification and claims (if any), the word ‘comprising’ and its derivatives including ‘comprises’ and ‘comprise’ include each of the stated integers but does not exclude the inclusion of one or more further integers.

Reference throughout this specification to ‘one embodiment’ or ‘an embodiment’ means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearance of the phrases ‘in one embodiment’ or ‘in an embodiment’ in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more combinations.

In compliance with the statute, the invention has been described in language more or less specific to structural, systems or methodical features. It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to specific features shown or described since the means herein described comprises preferred forms of putting the invention into effect. The invention is, therefore, claimed in any of its forms or modifications within the proper scope of the appended claims (if any) appropriately interpreted by those skilled in the art.

This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Australia Patent Application No. 2013902955, filed on Aug. 7, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

-   TP0 SERVING TP -   TP1 NEIGHBOURING TP 

1. A method for generating precoders for joint transmission (JT) in a downlink coordinated multi-point transmission/reception (DL CoMP) wireless communications system, the system including a plurality of transmission points (TPs) operable to communicate with a plurality of user equipments (UEs) wherein each UE has one of the TPs as its serving TP, and the method comprises: transmitting channel state information (CSI) from each UE to its serving TP, wherein the transmitted CSI includes precoder matrix indicators (PMI), and using the PMI to generate precoders for transmission of data from the plurality of TPs to the plurality of UEs.
 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein using the PMI to generate precoders involves using the PMI to find a representative matrix (Ĥ_(in)) representing the channel (H_(in)) between an n-th TP and an i-th UE.
 3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein a fixed codebook (Ω_(RI)) of representative matrices is generated from PMI codebook(s), the CSI transmitted from each UE to its serving TP includes a rank indicator (RI), and Ω_(RI) is different for different RI.
 4. The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein, if the RI for the i-th UE (RI_(i)) is equal to the number of receive antennas of the UE (N_(RX)) (i.e. if RI_(i)=N_(RX)) then Ω_(RI) contains matrices Ĥ(m), m=1, . . . of size N_(RX)×τ_(n), where τ_(n) is the number of antennas at the n-th TP.
 5. The method as claimed in claim 4 wherein, if RI_(i) is less than N_(RX) (i.e. if RI_(i)<N_(RX)) then Ω_(R), contains vectors ĥ(m), m=1, . . . of size τ_(n)×1.
 6. The method as claimed in claim 5 wherein, for RI_(i)=N_(RX), the representative matrix H_(in) is found by: Ĥ _(in) =Ĥ(m*)εΩ_(RI), i=1, . . . , N_(UE), n=1, . . . , N_(TP) with ${m^{*} = {\underset{m}{\arg \; \max}\; {tr}\left\{ {\left\lbrack {{\hat{H}(m)}W_{i\; n}} \right\rbrack^{H}\left\lbrack {{\hat{H}(m)}W_{i\; n}} \right\rbrack} \right\}}},\mspace{11mu} {{\hat{H}(m)} \in \Omega_{RI}}$ where N_(TP) and N_(UE) are the number of TPs and UEs, respectively, and W_(in) (size τ_(n)×RI_(i)) is a precoder associated with a reported PMI used for precoding data to send from the n-th TP to the i-th UE according to 3GPP standard (TS 36.211).
 7. The method as claimed in claim 6 wherein, for RI_(i)<N_(RX), the representative matrix Ĥ_(in) is found by: a) calculating correlation values as: C _(in)(m)=tr{[ĥ ^(H)(m)W _(in)]^(H)[ĥ^(H)(m)W _(in)]}, m=1, . . . and b) sorting to find the N correlation values C_(in)(m₁)>C_(in)(m₂)> . . . >C_(in)(m_(N) _(RX) ) and the corresponding vectors ĥ(m₁), ĥ(m₂), . . . , ĥ(m_(N) _(RX) ,) to form the channel matrix Ĥ _(in) =[ĥ(m ₁),ĥ(m ₂), . . . ,ĥ(m _(N) _(RX) )]^(H)
 8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein non-coherent precoding is used and the method further comprises using the representative matrix Ĥ_(in), a Lagrange multiplier ν_(n) and a noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² to compute the precoders (V_(in)).
 9. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein precoders V_(in) are computed using an iterative procedure.
 10. The method as claimed in claim 9, wherein precoders V_(in) are computed using the following iterative procedure where (m) denotes the m-th iteration: a) initialize a quantity G_(in) (m=0)=J_(in), i=1, . . . , N_(UE), where J_(in) is a RI_(i)×τ_(n) matrix with the (a,b)-th element being zero for a≠b and 1 for a=b; b) compute V_(in)(m+1) using G_(in)(m) and the Lagrange multiplier τ_(n) for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows: ${V_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{jn}^{H}{G_{jn}^{H}(m)}{G_{jn}(m)}H_{jn}}} + {\upsilon_{n}I}} \right\rbrack^{- 1}{\overset{\sim}{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}{G_{i\; n}^{H}(m)}}$ c) compute G_(in)(m+1) using V_(in)(m+1) and the noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows: ${G_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {{V_{i\; n}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}{V_{jn}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{V_{jn}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}}} + {\sigma_{i}^{2}I}} \right\rbrack}^{- 1}}$ d) compute $E = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\; n}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}}$ e) repeat step b), step c) and step d) until ${{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\; n}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\; n}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}} < ɛ},$ where ∥·∥² _(F) denotes the Frobenius norm and ε is a convergent threshold; and f) output V_(in)(m+1), i=1, . . . , N_(UE).
 11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the Lagrange multiplier ν_(n) for the n-th TP is computed using the following procedure: a) compute λ_(k) as ${U\; \Lambda \; U^{H}} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}^{H}{G_{i\; n}^{H}(m)}{G_{i\; n}(m)}{\hat{H}}_{i\; n}}}$ b) set ν_(min) and ν_(max); c) set ν_(n)=(ν_(max)+ν_(min))/2; d) compute a quantity ${{\hat{P}}_{n} = {\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{\tau_{n}}\; \frac{\lambda_{k}}{\left( {\lambda_{k} + \upsilon_{n}} \right)^{2}}}};$ e) check if {circumflex over (P)}_(n)>P_(n) and if so set ν_(min)=ν_(n) otherwise set ν_(max)=ν_(n), where P_(n) is the transmit power of the n-th TP; f) repeat step c), step d) and step e) until |{circumflex over (P)}_(n)−P_(n)|<κ, where ε is a convergent threshold; and g) output ν_(n).
 12. The method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the CSI transmitted from each UE to its serving TP includes a channel quality indicator (CQI) and the noise variance estimate 6,² is found using the CQI as follows: a) find the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) based on thresholds in the CQI table; and b) calculate σ_(i) ² using the SINR_(i1) and the serving TP's transmit power P_(s) as follows. ${\sigma_{i}^{2} = \frac{P_{s}/N_{UE}}{\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{L_{i}}\; {{SINR}_{il}/L_{i}}}},\mspace{11mu} {i = 1},\ldots \mspace{14mu},N_{UE}$ where L_(i) is the number of codewords used for the i-th UE.
 13. The method as claimed in claim 12 wherein, from up to N_(TP) reported RI_(in), the majority is selected as a single common RI_(i) for the i-th UE.
 14. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein only CQI_(i{circumflex over (n)})(l) associated with the selected RI_(i) are candidates for CQI selection, the selection is carried out per codeword independently, and the majority among the candidates is selected as a common CQI for the l-th codeword CQI_(i)(l).
 15. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein coherent precoding is used and the method further comprises finding a representative matrix Ĥ_(i) representing the total channel as follows: Ĥ_(i)=└Ĥ_(i1), Ĥ_(i2), . . . , Ĥ_(iN) _(TP) ┘, i=1, . . . , N_(UE)
 16. The method as claimed in claim 15, wherein the method further comprises using the representative matrix Ĥ_(i), a Lagrange multiplier τ and a noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² to compute the precoders (V_(i)).
 17. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein precoders V_(i) are computed using an iterative procedure.
 18. The method as claimed in claim 17, wherein precoders V_(i) are computed using the following iterative procedure where (m) denotes the m-th iteration: a) initialize G_(i)(m=0)=J_(i), i=1, . . . , N_(UE), where J_(i) is a RI_(i)×N_(TX) matrix with the (a,b)-th element being zero for a≠b and 1 for a≠b, and N_(TX) is the total number of transmit antennas of all TPs; b) compute V_(i)(m+1) using G_(i)(m) and the Lagrange multiplier ν for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows: ${V_{i\;}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{j}^{H}{G_{j}^{H}(m)}{G_{j}(m)}H_{j}}} + {\upsilon I}} \right\rbrack^{- 1}{\overset{\sim}{H}}_{i\;}^{H}{G_{i\;}^{H}(m)}}$ c) compute G_(i)(m+1) using V_(i)(m+1) and the noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² for i=1, . . . , N_(UE) as follows: ${G_{i\;}\left( {m + 1} \right)} = {{V_{i}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{{\hat{H}}_{i}^{H}\left\lbrack {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i}{V_{j}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{V_{j}^{H}\left( {m + 1} \right)}{\hat{H}}_{i}^{H}}} + {\sigma_{i}^{2}I}} \right\rbrack}^{- 1}}$ d) compute $E = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\;}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\;}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}}$ e) repeat step b), step c) and step d) until ${{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{{G_{i\;}\left( {m + 1} \right)} - {G_{i\;}(m)}}}_{F}^{2}} < ɛ};$ and f) output V_(i)(m+1), i=1, . . . , N_(UE).
 19. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the Lagrange multiplier ν is computed using the following procedure: a) compute λ_(k) as ${U\; \Lambda \; U^{H}} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N_{UE}}\; {{\hat{H}}_{i\;}^{H}{G_{i\;}^{H}(m)}{G_{i\;}(m)}{\hat{H}}_{i\;}}}$ b) set ν_(min) and ν_(max); c) set ν=(ν_(max)+ν_(min))/2; d) compute the following quantity ${\hat{P} = {\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{N_{TX}}\; \frac{\lambda_{k}}{\left( {\lambda_{k} + \upsilon} \right)^{2}}}};$ e) check if {circumflex over (P)}>P then set ν_(min)=ν otherwise set ν_(max)=ν, where P is the total transmit power ${P = {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{N_{TP}}P_{n}}};$ f) repeat step c), step d) and step e) until |{circumflex over (P)}−P|<ε, where ε is a convergent threshold; and g) output the Lagrange multiplier ν.
 20. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the CSI transmitted from each UE to its serving TP includes a channel quality indicator (CQI) and the noise variance estimate σ_(i) ² is found using the CQI as follows: a) find the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR_(i1)) based on the SINR thresholds in the CQI table; and b) calculate σ_(i) ² using the SINR,, and the serving TP's transmit power P_(s) as follows. ${\sigma_{i}^{2} = \frac{P_{s}/N_{UE}}{\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{L_{i}}\; {{SINR}_{il}/L_{i}}}},\mspace{11mu} {i = 1},\ldots \mspace{14mu},N_{UE}$ where L is the number of codewords used for the i-th UE.
 21. The method as claimed in claim 20 wherein, from as many as N_(TP) reported RI_(in), the majority is selected as a single common RI_(i) for the i-th UE.
 22. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein only CQI_(i{circumflex over (n)}) (l) associated with the selected RI_(i) are candidates for CQI selection, the selection is carried out per codeword independently, and the majority among the candidates is selected as the common CQI for the l-th codeword CQI_(i)(l).
 23. A downlink coordinated multi-point transmission/reception (DL COMP) wireless communications system in which joint transmission (JT) is performed between a plurality of transmission points (TPs) and a plurality of user equipments (UEs), wherein each UE has one of the TPs as its serving TP, channel state information (CSI) is transmitted from each UE to its serving TP, the transmitted CSI includes precoder matrix indicators (PMI), and the PMI is used to generate precoders for transmission of data from the plurality of TPs to the plurality of UEs. 